Terrible Advice in Glamour Magazine, Sponsored by Garnier? [UPDATED]
We were curled up last night with the new issue of Glamour and a cup of tea when we came across a reader-submitted questions page. Should I, the reader asked, do an at-home Brazilian blowout? Or is this something best left to the pros?
We were so excited! Here was a great opportunity for a major women’s magazine that we read every month (though, really, we read them all) to say something meaningful and instructive about the dangers of this sometimes-formaldehyde-laced hair treatment.
Finally, we thought, the issue has gone mainstream, and now, even the majors have been compelled by the incontrovertible evidence that the Brazilian, even when it’s labeled formaldehyde-free, can contain dangerous amounts of a dangerous chemical.
Alas.
That’s not what the article said. Instead, the expert said yes, in most cases, hair straightening treatments are best left to the pros (which is true, but there was no mention of maybe not doing it at all, despite the squawking headlines all over town about how potentially dangerous it is). They went on to say that if price or convenience was a concern to try some at-home blow-dry kits instead. Specifically one by Garnier.
Clearly, Glamour really, really likes this one in particular. They wrote about it in their September print issue, too.
Now, granted, this is not the same thing as a Brazilian blowout, and from the ingredients list we just read, it is formaldehyde-free. Yes, there may be a lesson to be learned from the recent events in Oregon, and we know that labels don’t always tell the truth. But let’s assume this label is telling the truth, because we have absolutely no reason to suppose it isn’t. There are still a half-dozen or more chemicals in this at-home treatment that we would never go near, and don’t think you—or Glamour’s readers and editors—should either.
Now ethics and chemicals aside, there’s one more problem: We admit that neither of us has tried this product but we’ve read enough beauty-blog comment sections to know that a lot of women are very disappointed with the results. One of our own readers even sent us a note a while back to say it didn’t deliver—making it hard for us to believe that this is really the be-all end-all of smooth hair.
Here’s to doing a better job next time.
Note: We originally linked to some ad-editorial stuff on Glam.com accidentally mistaking it for Glamour. Stupid us, seriously. We apologize. But we stand by everything else we said.






Totally agree with the sentiment that beauty mags could separate advertising from editorial a lot better, but in defense of Glamour – glam.com is not their website! Those aren’t their posts!
Right you are. We’ve corrected, and we apologize! Hasty, stupid mistake and we take full responsibility. We stand by the rest, though.
As you should! PS – Love this blog and the book, which I now tote around whenever I’m shopping for beauty products. My purse-lugging left shoulder may not be happy with it, but the rest of my body is. :)
Your first mistake was to be reading Glamour in the first place. It doesn’t impress me as a any type of consumer-protection publication, but rather a sort of shallow and superficial medium for the advertising and marketing industries.
Haha I hear what you’re saying, but I really just love unwinding with a good old fashioned magazine (I work in magazines, and they are my first love). I love looking at the pictures and find the occasional good article, too.
Thanks Lauren! My left shoulder takes a beating too from carrying around all this stuff with me all day.
I read an article several months ago in Allure that pissed me off- it was about parabens and if women should be concerned. I read the article in the hopes that they would tell the truth- what I read was so dissapointing and infuriating- the article basically went on to completly brush off all the concern about parabens and the risks it poses to your health and than plugged several pages of deodarants by Dove and the like. I felt highly let down.
Do you remember which issue it was in? We’d love to see it.
I want to say that it may have been January’s last issue? it was about a year ago- shortly after I read Julie Gabriels “Green Beauty Guide”. Might have been Febuary’s issue.